Tim’s Pics #2: “The Gift” (2000)
This is going to have to be an occasional series. More than
any other person in my world, Tim Kozlowski has seen an immense number of films,
many of which I haven’t. I will also argue that his taste is impeccable. And to
be sure, we may not agree on the quality of a film. Chances are good, though,
that if he has a recommendation, it’s worth following up on. In fact, he should be writing his own blog!
This is the second movie I am taking a look at here that the
esteemed Mr. K has suggested (the first being "Dodsworth"). Sam Raimi’s a genius, for sure, and “The Gift” has
him working from Billy Bob Thornton and Tom Epperson’s script. It’s a solid
piece of Southern Gothic mixed with well-rendered characters at the center of
which is psychic Annie Wilson (Cate Blanchett once again delivering a master
class) who as one character tells her, is the heart of the small town in
Georgia.
Despite Raimi’s pedigree for horror, suspense, and general
creepiness, this is Raimi the poet. The Spanish moss hanging from entwined branches
of arboreal cupolas against a moonlit sky, mangroves like sentinels aligned
along a river’s length, and the general sense of languor permeate the film. There
is a pensive air throughout and Annie’s “gift” isn’t played fatuously or even
treated as all that unusual. It may be mocked by the local sheriff (J.K.
Simmons turning in another fully fleshed character that would have otherwise
been a sketch in lesser hands) or the defense attorney who attempts to belittle
Annie’s contribution to the murder case around which the plot revolves; but we
see the toll it takes on her repeatedly as the story moves along.
As with the best of the genre, the film isn’t really about
the protagonist’s power; it’s about the trauma and misery that riddles the
characters’ lives. It’s here that Thornton and Epperson’s script gives full
voice to the afflictions we visit on one another and the sometimes fatal
consequences those entail. From Keanu Reeves’ wife-beating abuser to Giovanni
Ribisi’s (in a defining role; this could have gone so very wrong and Ribisi
brought an enormous range of emotion to his role) Buddy, no one is without
unresolved issues, often deep ones. Especially not Annie, who has yet to come
to terms with her husband’s death.
Annie’s clients come to her for therapy as much as for any
prognostication she can offer and it is her empathy that drives the film while
leaving you to wonder why she won’t just talk to her oldest son, who’s
practically begging her to, about his dad. What Raimi captures – and it’s there
in the script – is how definitive a parent’s power is in a Southern upbringing.
As a kid, you might question your folks, but you were unlikely to gain any
traction from that questioning and a curt dismissal was often the best you
could expect (speaking from experience). Similarly, here, Blanchett is never nasty
to her eldest, but she pays his concerns so little mind that the offhand
cruelty feels almost out of character. It is, but not because of him, it’s
patently because she’s not ready to deal with her loss.
If this isn’t enough to handle, there’s Hilary Swank’s Valerie
Barksdale whose face is battered by her husband Donnie. Keanu Reeves is scary
good as a bullying fundamentalist Christian philanderer who has no problem
forcing his way into Annie’s house to threaten her and her boys and warning her
to stay away from his wife. She’s told Valerie to leave Donnie, to get help and
so on, but we know how toxic these relationships are and both Swank and Reeves
are able to convey that sense of not being able to change their behavior.
Then there’s Buddy, who may be somewhat developmentally
challenged but you can read the abuse in his eyes. He sees Annie as his only
friend, the only person he can talk to, and she senses that there is a deep
issue between him and his father. He denies that there’s a problem and gets upset
when Annie presses too hard at him.
As we meet each of these characters, there’s a kind of hermetic
closeness that settles around Annie. Even the antagonistic elements seem drawn
to her beyond their control but not in any overt sense present in the script. Even
when we step out of this circle and begin to be introduced to the wider
community via a party at the town’s country club, there’s a dreamlike air over
the proceedings. We’ve caught glimpses of Annie’s vision earlier when she meets
Wayne Collins (Greg Kinnear, the sincerest nice guy actor around) and his fiancée
Jessica (a too briefly seen Katie Holmes) and can safely surmise that they’re
going to encounter some issues. (Look, that’s understatement; trust me, what
they’re headed for is extreme unpleasantness.)
At the country club, Annie has a vision of a more mundane
sort when she sees Jessica getting ready to get it on with the town’s powerful
lawyer, David Duncan (Gary Cole – goddamn! He is soooo good at playing these
shits!) in the bathroom. Later, she comes outside and chats with Wayne and doesn’t,
of course, let on about what she’s seen. However, you know it’s going to come
out sooner or later.
Indeed, no secret stays put in a small town for very long
and it doesn’t help when there’s someone for whom there are potentially no
secrets.
Soon enough, we discover Jessica’s gone missing and the
sheriff, Wayne, and her father come to Annie for help. She gives a fairly unsuccessful
reading but later encounters Jessica’s chained and bloodied corpse floating in
the space above her. She has already had a nightmare of being strangled after
he encounter with Donnie, and while initially pleasant, had a conversation with
her deceased grandmother (Rosemary Harris!) warning her of a coming storm. It’s
safe to say that Annie’s gift isn’t always welcome.
As the story unfolds, Jessica’s body is found in the pond on
Donnie’s property and he is quickly arrested for her murder. It isn’t long
before he’s tried and sentenced and in one of those moments where my suspension
of disbelief was strained more than by Annie’s second sight, was why the judge didn’t
throw the case out when it came to Annie’s testimony. A mistrial would have
been likely because the police were pursuing an investigation based on an
unprovable basis. While it is in keeping with how accepted her ability is by the
film’s logic, I still had to work to stay with the trial from that point.
The first day of the trial is the opening arguments and
examination and cross-examination of Donnie. Coming out afterward, Annie encounters
Buddy who begs her to listen to him. He is extremely upset and the bad thoughts
are coming more and he finds himself touching himself when he thinks about his
father. She’s repulsed, tells him things will be fine but that she can’t really
talk to him because she’s going through a lot, as well.
Later that evening, Annie gets a call to go to Buddy’s where he’s tied his father to a chair and is flogging him violently, payback for the sexual abuse he suffered as a child. Buddy screams at Annie his sense of betrayal and at his mother the recriminations a lifetime in coming. His mother had not called the police because Buddy said he’d kill his father if she did, but at this point, that becomes moot when he douses the old man with gasoline and sets him alight. Buddy is remanded into custody, his father is on the way to the ICU, and Annie has to testify the next day.
Donnie is sentenced, of course, and Jessica later sees that
he is innocent. She calls on David Duncan to reopen the case, but when he
resists the idea, she mentions that she saw his quickie with Jessica and would
go public with if he didn’t. It’s at this point that the script falters.
The issue with this particular form of the Gothic tale is
that it’s extremely difficult to handle the deus ex machina of the
paranormal with the same degree of gravity of the “real” world and/or vice
versa in order to make both narrative aspects work. I don’t faulty anyone involved
by this point, but the spinning plates are out of sync with one another. When Wayne
come to Annie to impress on her to do a reading, you already know he’s the culprit.
You do. If you don’t, you really haven’t been paying attention. Not because he’s
done anything overt, but because he hasn’t. I honestly didn’t buy his dissolution
after Jessica’s body was found as much more than him realizing what he had
done. But to be sure, this misses the point. Or at least, I think it misses the
point that Thornton and Epperson were getting at; everyone in this film among
the main characters is or has been damaged.
And again, at the center of all these storms is Annie. Of
course, when Wayne suggests that he and Annie go back to the pond so she can
reconnect to the energy there, he knows she’s going to see the full story play
out. He knows he’s going to see Jessica mocking him, flaunting her affair with
Donnie and demeaning his masculinity, and throwing in his face that the only
reason they were getting married is because her father likes him. Of course, he
kills her in a fit. And so on. If I don’t sound enthusiastic at this point, it’s
because I’m not. This wasn’t the longest stretch in the film, but it felt like
it. And worse, it felt like it because it was telegraphed.
He strikes Annie hard enough to draw blood and we see his
arm coming down to deliver the final blow that we had seen in her visions and
we see Buddy halt the strike and knock Wayne out. Once Wayne is secured in the trunk
of Annie’s car, Buddy confesses he escaped the holding facility he was in,
tells Annie that she was his only friend and he loves her. Parked in front of
the police station, she tells him he’ll have to go back to the facility, he
agrees and when she turns around before going in.
In catching up with the sheriff, we learn that Wayne has confessed
to everything and he tells Annie that it couldn’t have been Buddy that saved
her since he had committed suicide at six o’clock that evening. She produces a
small baby’s kerchief she had given Buddy earlier in the movie that he returned
to her and the scene ends.
I want to pause for a minute. A lot happened in the denouement
that would have been tough for any filmmaker to handle. As I mentioned, the
reveal that Wayne had done Jessica in wasn’t particularly revelatory. The wrap
up exposition was shot beautifully (the movie is gorgeous, thanks to Raimi’s
long time DP, Jamie Anderson) but the momentum was unsustainable and frankly,
wasn’t there. I realize that we are looking at a “horror” film to some degree,
but folded into is suspense that has long since dissipated and I can think of a
couple of other ways this could have played out more efficiently and as
dramatically, given the strengths of the performer.
Yes, the confrontation on the pier on the pond was
necessary, but the exposition could have happened sooner with Wayne’s attack
filmed at a faster and more brutal angle and rate. Yes, Buddy by this point, had to be included (but here again, there could
have been earlier, other choices made with his character that might have compromised
or erased his significance; as much as I loved Ribisi’s performance, I could
see other options available without losing the supernatural element). It is simply
a clunky conclusion to a fairly packed narrative. And there’s the rub: “fairly
packed” borders on overstuffed. It’s a matter of trying to do too much with
what’s at hand and having said that, it’s wise that Raimi did take his time and
let the story unfold as leisurely as he did.
So did the denouement derail the film? No. It actually did not. The final shot is short but emotional; we see Annie with her boys at her husband’s grave in a group embrace that holds a tremendous amount of weight as Raimi moves in for a tight shot. I came away with a sense that this family, these characters had crossed a hurdle. There will still be issues, but a significant one has been met and it may extend to Annie becoming more effective in her role as that town’s soul.
Comments
Post a Comment