Reaction Shots

Photo credit:  Ben Gabbe/Getty Images and Them.us Recently, I’ve begun reprising “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” series with an eye to examining how much of the show’s DNA has been passed on down through succeeding generations in both film and TV. Also, I wanted to see if my sense of the characters has changed much and last, but certainly not least, what effect the past year or so of allegations against Joss Whedon recast how I view the series/read the text. It’s this last that’s going to occupy us here, but the other two approaches are part of the mix, as well. I first watched “Buffy” beginning with the third season and caught up through reruns. I stuck with it fairly devotedly/regularly through season five and didn’t really see all of six and seven until I got a boxed set of DVDs. I did catch the odd season six/seven episode when they aired and wild horses weren’t going to stop me from watching the series finale. I came to actually prefer “Angel” at a certain point but felt things were o

Both of these flicks are similar: charismatic heroes and supporting characters, more or less conflicted bad guys, fantastical settings, beautiful CGI, and a self-aware (to varying degrees) silliness quotient. So why did one capture my attention and hold it and I had to get up, take a break from the other and decide if I’d finish the movie? “Aquaman” is out in limited re-release and I was kind of sorry I missed it on the first go-round three years ago. It looked like really engaging, dumb fun. It is that until it’s not. Then it becomes a slog. A gorgeous slog, but a slog nonetheless. The story is comic book dopey; Arthur Curry (Jason Momoa) is the scion of the Queen of Atlantis who fled to the surface to avoid an arranged marriage (a CGI-enhanced Nicole Kidman? Honestly, I can’t tell anymore…) and a lighthouse keeper ( Temuera Morrison ). Eventually, Atlantis catches up to her and she realizes she has to return. Little Arthur is trained over the years by his Atlantean family’s vizier