Ridley Scott’s Double Standards
Lower Standards, More Fun Is there any director quite as diverse in genre output as Ridley Scott? Any, anyway, that are recognized as mainstream? I can think of some, sure, but they are rare but I don’t think any are as consistent as Scott in his output, both in terms of regularity (it sometimes seems he just poops movies out) and even if the quality is variable, it’s of a usually decent order. At the very, very least, I can’t think of a Ridley Scott movie that has actively bored me. To be sure, I’ve found some tedious to the brink of boring, but I don’t recall ever being thoroughly bored. Even “Gladiator” which left me pissed off that I’d wasted hours on a pointless story at the very least had a scenery chewing performance from Russell Crowe (despite how idiotic the story was) and god, was it gorgeous to look at. If there’s an issue with Ridley Scott’s movies, it’s never in the visual craft. He evokes worlds and atmospheres like a painter. No, the issues are often found in c...