Short Takes: Martin Scorsese’s “It’s Not Just You, Murray!” (1964)

-

It’s not just you, Murray poster


I say this pretty often in discussion; if you want to have some fun, watch great directors’ old student films or their early shorts. You’ll often be pleasantly surprised by how early many of the greats established themes and approaches to the medium that they would explore more fully over time. Welles’ “Too Much Johnson”, Cronenberg’s “Crimes of the Future”, Lynch’s “The Alphabet” all presage, to varying degrees, what is to come. 

Martin Scorsese’s “It’s Not Just You, Murray!” is another early shot across the bow. Shot in 1964 at Scorsese’s apartment and won the Producers Guild Award for Best Student Film. It remains one of his funniest films and already lays down techniques and themes he would utilize and pursue throughout his career.


In story, it’s about Murray, a former bootlegger who has risen to great power within the mob and his misadventures along the way, including his wife’s relationship with his best friend Joe. Ira Rubin plays Murray and comes across more as an accountant than a mobster; conversely, Sam DeFazio’s Joe looks more enforcer than lawyer (if such as he is…Murray just refers to him as his best friend). 


It’s a short, sharp 15 minutes or so; but within that time, we see a story unfold in flashback with freeze frames, music that supports and enhances the narrative and that leads to a freaking good kaleidoscopic interlude that if it isn’t Busby Berkeley, really, really works. There are also metatextual references to the French crime films (I’m thinking very much of Jean-Pierre Melville, but I wouldn’t rule out Godard’s influence) and a direct homage to Fellini that is genuinely earned and not merely a clever student’s addition to fill in a lack of ideas.


“It’s Not Just You, Murray!” is available on HBO Max. Also, look for Scorsese’s mom! I think this is her earliest onscreen performance in an almost direct template for the dinner scene in “Goodfellas”. 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

30s Hitch: Rich and Strange (1931)

-
Image
This failure unquestionably affected Hitchcock. There is something paradoxical about the fact that this popular film director  never managed to get his most daring, his most candid, works  accepted. The failure of Rich and Strange, like the later failure of Under Capricorn, undoubtedly prevented him from continuing along a path that he nevertheless knew was promising. If we consider Hitchcock's overall career until now [1957], it immediately becomes apparent that all his films tend to blaze or consolidate a new trail, and that just when things are about to take off, a commercial failure checks his élan and forces him to look elsewhere. His most sincere works, such "pure films" as The Manxman, Rich and Strange, Under Capricorn, and most recently The WrongMan, were culminating efforts, whereas to Hitchcock's way of thinking, they should have been points of departure.  Eric Rohmer and Claude Chabrol, Hitchcock: The First Forty-Four Films(1) The Skin Game , Hitchcock'
Read more

Remake/Remodel/Revision: "Barbie" (2023)

-
Image
Out of the gate, when I first heard Amy Schumer was working on a Barbie movie, I leaped ahead trying to wrap my mind around the bits that Schumer would frame. There'd be plenty of innuendo, some shrewd observational and slapstick comedy, and likely, a sure thread of subversion throughout. What I couldn't figure out is what would drive the plot? A Barbie come to life like some out of control mecha? An Ex Machina with Barbie in place of Eva?  Then the project halted as Schumer and Warners parted company over creative differences. Then, Greta Gerwig's name shows up attached to the project. And Noah Baumbach. And Margot Robbie. And Ryan Gosling and before long it sounded like someone's idea of an artists' loft party gone out of control. And all of it somehow involving the IP of one of the most reviled and/or lauded products from Mattel. The convocation of two of our finest auteurs with Hollywood royalty sounded like a match made in some Warholian heaven. After seeing t
Read more

The First Great Film of 2023: Past Lives

-
Image
  " Time present and time past Are both perhaps present in time future,  And time future contained in time past. " (1) At the end of Celine Song's remarkable film Past Lives , Hae Sung (Teo Yoo) wonders if he and Na, now Nora, Young (Greta Lee, who deserves a Best Actress nomination right now) are together in a future at this very moment. A running thread throughout the story is very much about the roads we go down, the relationships we start but never quite conclude, and the paths not taken. Song takes the Korean term inyeon/ 인연 as the thematic underpinning that provides layer upon layer of tension between the possibilities of the past faded into the actuality of the present.  Inyeon is translated as "encounter" but it has more nuance than that might imply(2). As Nora explains it to her husband Arthur (a beautifully sensitive John Magaro), the word relies on context; in a past life, two people may have brushed sleeves in passing, but something's been estab
Read more